Eh, too many fans. That thing probably whirls like a dryer filled with towels. Even if they are 120mm. That’s just excessive beyond the point of practicality.
Also more like Facepalm for spending $600 on a video card when you’d see ZERO difference between that and a $250 one on DS2. =P
Your icon says apple, your name says android, and you’re running Windows 7.
Sorry, random observation
despite being a popular opinion, only this thread remains of a discussion that apparently cannot be had.
It’s a branch off the sewers, I believe.
Most credible websites will not raise hell over rumors or speculation. (We aren’t 100% sure at this point.)
That said, I’m surprised Kuchera hasn’t written a piece on it.
I’m not so sure you remember what the PS2 looked like. I mean, it isn’t fantastic, but early/mid PS3 is more accurate.
Max in-game settings or nVidia Inspector? I’m asking that because I haven’t seen said footage to compare… but most games have really awful “max” settings that can easily be overwritten with drivers.
Are these games really otome? I’d figure they’d be targeted towards 12 year old boys, not girls.
I tend to like the artwork in many NIS titles, and the gameplay looks interesting… but my interest is always kicked by stupidly dressed female characters. “Enslave your enemy…. …..with a fetish pose?”
I guess that’s kinda what NIS has become known for lately, I rather miss the times of Phantom Brave, La Pucelle:Tactics, and Sakura Wars. Those always had the… eccentric elements but lately they’ve been overdoing it.
Would you like to repeat that?
No, it’s PS4 because Sony paid them to make it PS4. No other reason.
I say this because I’m QUITE certain that a PS4 is not capable of the right pic, specifically the lighting.
Are we sure the right pic isn’t PC? (I know it’s from the PS4 dog and pony, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t running on a PC.)
I’m an Ubisoft fanboy. (What of it?) But even I have to agree with the AC3/FC3. I didn’t mind ACIV so much because I approached the side-objectives piecemeal instead of all at once. Mixing up the side and story quests provided enough variation that I was okay with it.
3 on the other hand, nothing could save that game.
At the same time, you can’t patch fun. (See:FFXIV pre-ARR.)
If a game this far along in its development is described as “not fun” it would have to be the largest turnaround in history to match most people’s expectations.
My prediction:I’m going to like it, because I’m not hyping it as the second coming of Christ like most people. But those who are, are setting themselves up for disappointment.
I could say the same about Skyrim and if you say you dislike that game, people start shooting arrows at your knees. Or heck, even GTA games. Skyscrapers are skyscrapers.
Vice City was the best for this reason.
Uhhhh…. this is not true. Partially.
Prior to Harry Potter/LEGO Batman 2, every LEGO game was indeed the same. Anything past there (LotR, City, Marvel, Movie, etc) are all very different games from the original bunch with the aforementioned games being a transition period where Tt was hitting their stride.
Unfortunately, this includes MOSTLY the bad ones. So to correct your statement: 4 of the same game, and 2 good games.
I’d be more likely to buy this if I DIDN’T play every Lego game though. Especially since 4 of the 6 are probably the 4 worst LEGO games…. especially if we are taking the DS ports.
Batman 2 and Harry Potter were quite good games, though IMO Multiplayer is what made them so good. (I play them with my kids)