Worms: Revolution is just the latest example of the franchise’s noble yet damning quest for evolution.
|Platform 360, PS3, Win, PS Vita
|Release Date Oct 10, 2012
Worms began in 1995 as an Artillery-style turn-based strategy game with destructible environments. Since then, that initial concept has been refined with the addition of new weapons and mechanics, but the core of the game has gone practically untouched. Worms: Revolution still has that core. It once again stars annelids who utilize grenades, shotguns and exploding sheep to battle each other. It sticks with the 2D perspective that has made previous games so tactically viable, letting you plan out each move quickly and easily. But despite that classic 2D point of view, the environments are now made up of polygons instead of 2D sprites. One might think of this as an improvement. It is not.
Worms revolves around precision. The best players will tell you that knowing exactly how a grenade will bounce off the landscape or whether your worm can backflip onto a higher ledge is the difference between a win and a loss. The introduction of 3D landscapes throws all of this precision out the window. There are too many variables and no easy way to tell whether a slight slant in the landscape will have any effect on your grenade.
That ledge? Apparently I can't jump onto it, because there's some tiny, near-invisible outcropping of polygons preventing it from happening. When the environments were in 2D, every change in the landscape was crisp, clear and obvious. If you were good enough you could plan every jump. In Worms: Revolution, that sort of precision is impossible.
Classes are another well thought out variable added to the Worms formula in Revolution. You can select between four types of worms, ranging from speedy scouts to slow-moving bruisers. The class system forces players to take new tactics into account. Do I want to target the scientist and stop the flow of healing or chip away at the heavies? You can mix and match the varied classes to play to your strengths. It's less about luck and more about making the most of each and every unit you have at your disposal.
These clever new elements are taught through a single-player campaign that is essentially a tutorial, backed by hammy dialog from a goofy nature documentarian. But the campaign is a chore, once again hampered by the 3D environments that make moves so difficult to predict. The puzzle levels in the campaign are especially reliant on doing one specific thing at one specific location on the map; being a pixel off results in disaster. When not in puzzle levels, I trudged through battles against AI which seems to have no middle ground between profoundly stupid and unfairly ingenious.
no middle ground between profoundly stupid and unfairly ingenious
Which leaves you with the multiplayer, the core of the Worms franchise. Multiplayer is as full-featured as it has been in recent Worms games, with a handful of mode and worm customization options. But, once the game starts, the whole experience is brought low by -- you guessed it -- those pesky 3D environments. They turn the beautiful strategy of worms into a three-ring circus...and not the fun kind.
WORMS: REVOLUTION'S UNINSPIRED CHANGES ADD NOTHING TO THE FRANCHISE
If the developers had just added the new fluid dynamics and classes, but kept the environments the same, Worms: Revolution would be an enjoyable, if uninspired, entry in the series. But, with the 3D environments, Worms: Revolution becomes something far worse. It's noble to try to bring some changes to this long-running franchise, but only if they're well-thought out, patient, and beneficial to the strategy at the heart of the series. The rewrites in Worms: Revolution are not.About Polygon's Reviews