AmiralPatate

There’s some very popular radio programs that do just that. People are weird.

Fourteen years after the original Uncharted’s release, the movie is finally in sight for longtime fans.

And what you see what they can make with fourteen years, you really wonder if they shouldn’t make it an even fifty.

You don’t want to know how the sausage is made. But that doesn’t necessarily means you want sausage to be made in the cruelest, most horrible way possible.

I mean it’s exactly like just providing game footage and telling everyone you were holding a GameCube, there’s just the unnecessary additional step of adding a cartoon character on top of it.

I don’t particularly think there’s a reason to doubt the veracity of it though.

Well that sounds like a whole lotta criminal negligence.

It would seem to favor stickiness over temporary spikes in popularity.

At least the image used in the article very clearly notes the figures are for a 28-day window after release. If that doesn’t measure a spike in popularity, I don’t know what does.

This also potentially favour series with more episodes and/or longer runtime. I wouldn’t rewatch the same show within a month, but if you make twenty 40-minute episodes that’s a lot more airtime than 6 1-hour episodes, without necessarily reflecting a better ability to capture the audience.

Also staying power. Which is good because there’s power in it, and power is powerful.

Same, I was really looking forward to some movie made by a studio.

"When you create a [sequel] you have to make sure you will come with something that will be different enough from what you did before," Guillemot told IGN.

Unless maybe you have an absurdly good formula and are thinking about turning it into Conviction or Blacklist. Then you don’t have to to make it different.

The boat thing was definitely not challenging, just bad design.

That said, those games were memorable even with all their flaws.

Spaghetti Western specifics reinvented the western genre, which indicates the genre in fact existed before.

Helen Mirren (Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw)

Uncalled for.

he flinches dramatically

He really doesn’t, especially not for a guy that gets shot at point blank.

I’d like everybody to remember Steven Spielberg made Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and Ready Olayer One. And you don’t have to lookup the guy’s name to know he’s made some universally acclaimed movies.

But you don’t know if that’s the case here.

C’mon. They’re henchmen in a corridor. He doesn’t even slow down. He stands in the way of gunfire without looking to take cover. We’ve already seen him absorb bullets in another scene. I wasn’t born yesterday. I know.

I can easily tell what happens in the scene.

You can gather surface level, non-specific information such as "he walks inti a hallway" and fights a "handful of guys".
Does he uses punhes? Kicks? Gadgets? I mean it’s obviously not shot to be a combat scene (or a really bad one), I guess it’s there to set the mood that Batman is unstoppable and unkillable. Because when you think about a man tough as steel in the DC universe, you obviously think Batman.

But to extrapolate a whole tonal shift from a clip without context is silly

It’s not like the rest of that trailer is very consistent.

You’ve watched a one or two second clip from a trailer of an unreleased movie.

Perhaps they should choose better clips to show off then.

There’s a clear gritty and dark aesthetic in this trailer, which doesn’t really match up with an impenetrable fully bulletproof suit. There’s no stakes if the hero can slowly walk into a dark hallway and absorb gunfire. What’s the danger there? What’s the tension? Why does he even bother fighting them?
And then it’s filmed in such a way that you can barely tell what’s happening on screen. Case in point, you can’t seem to be able to tell there’s at least 4 dudes with machine guns in that hallway, maybe 6, I don’t know, I can’t tell even freeze framing it.

It doesn’t look like a very good scene.

I don’t see any reason to not continue with Lashana Lynch as 007 instead of James Bond.

You’d have to ask Eugène Pottier about it.

They are nothing, let them be all.

I see what you did there

how much time does starting with the base code actually save you?

Perhaps none. However you have a product on sale that generates revenue. Even if it takes months or years to optimise, you’re doing so while getting paid rather than spending money out of pocket.

Obviously beating your wife is a criminal matter and there’s an age where casual racism is your own fault. But I agree that blacklisting kids for having access to fame and money beyond their wildest dreams without the maturity and support to handle is perhaps attacking the symptoms rather than the cause.

I think it’s very clear there’s a system that profits from these athletes and it doesn’t seem to quite care what happens to them. The same happens in reality TV or youtube/streaming.

I’m just curious what a "generic likeness" looks like. Like probably the whitest guy you’ve ever seen.

Judging by the demo, not having a good time seems to be a feature of the game, even when your team is somewhat helpful.

And it only took them eleven months to come up with that.

There’s an irony for mentioning Ghost Recon from 20 years ago and how it’s not the same anymore, and then using the same argument to dunk on Siege by comparing it to Vegas, which wasn’t exactly the most faithful entry to the series and a definite departure from the first games.

Underlining that sometimes it’s fine for things to change.

Lightsaber duels in the originals aren’t very technically impressive compared to the combat in a John Wick, but it does convey the emotion it needs to convey, which makes them good.